<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dissecting Influence &#187; headline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissectinginfluence.com/tag/headline/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissectinginfluence.com</link>
	<description>Predicting your unpredictable behavior.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 23:40:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Headlines and Benefits &#8211; Be Honest, but not that honest&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://dissectinginfluence.com/headlines-and-benefits-be-honest-but-not-that-honest</link>
		<comments>http://dissectinginfluence.com/headlines-and-benefits-be-honest-but-not-that-honest#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copywriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissectinginfluence.com/?p=220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m reading a book called &#8220;50 Case Histories on How to Write and Design Ads that Work.&#8221;  So far, it&#8217;s interesting. The editors of the book reviewed the results from successful ads (both consumer and business) and reported on the aspects of the winning letters. I&#8217;d change some things in the book, but it&#8217;s interesting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reading a book called &#8220;<em>50 Case Histories on How to Write and Design Ads that Work</em>.&#8221;  So far, it&#8217;s interesting. The editors of the book reviewed the results from successful ads (both consumer and business) and reported on the aspects of the winning letters. I&#8217;d change some things in the book, but it&#8217;s interesting nonetheless. You could get a great list of ideas from this book.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s one of the examples tested for an ad on insurance:</p>
<p>Headline 1: &#8220;<em>Great new insurance plan pays hospital, surgical expenses</em>&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Comment: Not great, but it&#8217;s short and direct. And the benefit is obvious. </p>
<p>Headline 2: &#8220;<em>Now great new insurance plan offers you protection for hospital, surgical, and/or doctors&#8217; bills and/or lost income.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Comment: This headline has no rhythm or flow, but it does offer more benefits. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The first headline pulled in double the response. (That&#8217;s not surprising. It is easier to read and it flows.) The editors claim the second headline should have done better, since it&#8217;s providing more benefits. More benefits equals higher results, right? In general, yes.</p>
<p>In this case, there are two flaws in the copy. 1 &#8211; The underlying story going on in the customer&#8217;s head. 2 &#8211; The use of logic (specifically, the word &#8216;OR&#8217;).</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s talk about the first one. Stories.</p>
<p>Every person on the planet is living in their own reality. Even you. Now, I&#8217;m not talking about the crazy people you see in the insane asylums or the people who have been hit with demetia. I mean every person on the planet &#8211; even the sane &#8211; is living in their own reality. They have their own history, language, experiences, and stories. Any experience is filtered through this lens of reality.</p>
<p>By the way, this means you, too.</p>
<p>As you read the headline above, you are running through an internal story. In the first headline, the story is &#8211; &#8220;Well, I know I have to pay hospital bills and they sometimes get expensive, so it would be nice to get money to pay them off.&#8221; The basic idea is &#8216;Free money&#8217; or &#8216;Free hospital care.&#8217; </p>
<p>That&#8217;s a fairly compelling benefit. </p>
<p>In the second headline, the same benefit is described as &#8216;protection from &#8230;..&#8221; Although logically equivalent, the story going through someone&#8217;s head is different. The reader is thinking, &#8220;Protection!?!? I need protection from the hospital&#8230;? Are they the mafia? Do they mean protection from disease? Am I going to get sick if I go to the hospital? Wait, what if I die?&#8221; and so on&#8230;.</p>
<p>By using the word &#8216;protection&#8217;, the story inside a reader&#8217;s head becomes, &#8216;The hospital is going to do something to me that forces me to need protection.&#8217; </p>
<p>That&#8217;s not really the best motivator. In fact, I bet this headline scared more people away from the hospital.</p>
<p>Just because you are adding more benefits doesn&#8217;t mean that the reader is interpreting them as such. Always pay attention to the story going on in your reader&#8217;s head. Remember, you are writing for their reality, not yours. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>As for the second attribute &#8211; Logic &#8211; I&#8217;ll cover that one tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissectinginfluence.com/headlines-and-benefits-be-honest-but-not-that-honest/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
